When Action Arrived
Published action records across the covered window, split into RegOversight severity bands. Empty intervals remain visible.
| Interval | Total | S0–S1 · lifted / low | S2–S3 · moderate / high | S4–S5 · major / severe |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Jul | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 2 Jul | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 3 Jul | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| 4 Jul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 Jul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 Jul | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 7 Jul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 Jul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 Jul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 10 Jul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 11 Jul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 12 Jul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 Jul | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 |
| 14 Jul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 Jul | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 Jul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 Jul | 8 | 0 | 6 | 2 |
| 18 Jul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Jul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Jul | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| 21 Jul | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 Jul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Jul | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 |
| 24 Jul | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 Jul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Jul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Jul | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 28 Jul | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 Jul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Jul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Jul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
What Stood Out
Each finding is grounded in precomputed metrics. Open it to inspect the supporting numbers and the limits of the claim.
The month included two banking-sector licence exits
RBI cancelled the banking licence of Paytm Payments Bank Limited. Coöperatieve Rabobank U.A. also ceased to be a banking company through an RBI notification published in the Gazette of India.
Severe actions took a larger share of the record
Severe actions rose to 16, or 36.4%, from 8, or 22.9%, in June 2026. Cancellations numbered 3, against 2 in June 2026, while supersessions were 0 in both periods.
Co-operative banks accounted for most of the penalty increase
Co-operative banks accounted for 70.3% of the ₹86.5 lakh increase, with disclosed penalties rising to ₹1.10 crore from ₹49.4 lakh. Banks accounted for 25.2% and NBFCs for 4.5% of the increase.
Entity coverage was broader than the action-record count
There were 44 action records and 235 entities declared. The largest order alone declared 192 entities.
What RBI Did and Where It Landed
Amber bars show the current mix. The fine marker shows the comparable earlier period, so a change is visible rather than merely asserted.
Action mix
Primary recorded action category.
- Monetary penalty29 · 65.9%
Previous 27 · 77.1%
- Business restriction12 · 27.3%
Previous 6 · 17.1%
- Licence cancellation3 · 6.8%
Previous 2 · 5.7%
Lifecycle
Fresh actions, extensions and withdrawals.
- Fresh action33 · 75%
Previous 30 · 85.7%
- Extension11 · 25%
Previous 5 · 14.3%
Entity types
Action records by regulated-entity class, not entities affected.
- Co-operative bank33 · 75%
Previous 26 · 74.3%
- NBFC8 · 18.2%
Previous 8 · 22.9%
- Bank2 · 4.5%
Previous 1 · 2.9%
- Payment entity1 · 2.3%
Why RBI acted
Overlapping themes; one action may carry several reasons.
- Reporting & disclosure19 · 43.2%
Previous 16 · 45.7%
- Governance & oversight14 · 31.8%
Previous 11 · 31.4%
- KYC / AML10 · 22.7%
Previous 10 · 28.6%
- Lending norms9 · 20.5%
Previous 10 · 28.6%
- Other7 · 15.9%
Previous 6 · 17.1%
- Capital & exposure norms5 · 11.4%
Previous 8 · 22.9%
Defining Actions
Up to four non-duplicative actions selected for monetary impact, breadth, severity or relief. Quiet periods may show fewer.
Reserve Bank of India imposes monetary penalty on Bank of Baroda
3 Jul 2026₹63.6 lakhmonetary penaltyBank of Baroda
The bank was penalized for non-compliance with RBI directions on Fair Practices Code for Lenders and KYC. It had charged interest higher than the contracted rate in certain loan accounts and failed to upload certain customers’ KYC records to CKYCR within the prescribed timeline.
RBI cancels Certificate of Registration of 192 NBFCs
15 Jul 2026licence cancellationNaveen Merico Engineering Co. Private Limited
RBI cancelled the Certificate of Registration of 192 NBFCs under Section 45-IA(6) of the RBI Act, 1934.
Winding up of Paytm Payments Bank Limited
28 Jul 2026licence cancellationPaytm Payments Bank Limited
RBI cancelled the banking licence of Paytm Payments Bank Limited under Section 22(4) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. The release also notes the High Court ordered winding up and appointment of a liquidator.
Cessation of “Coöperatieve Rabobank U.A.” as a banking company within the meaning of sub section (2) of Section 36 (A) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949
27 Jul 2026licence cancellationCoöperatieve Rabobank U.A.
The entity has ceased to be a banking company within the meaning of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, via RBI notification published in the Gazette of India.
What It Cost
29 actions had a disclosed amount. Totals and distribution shape are kept separate from action volume.
- Median
- ₹3.1 L
- Largest
- ₹63.6 L
- Top five
- ₹1.17 cr
- 95th percentile
- ₹13.3 L
Previous ₹2.7 L
Previous ₹41.8 L
Previous ₹72.25 L
Previous ₹14.25 L
Change by entity type
Arithmetic attribution of the change in disclosed value. Contributions may exceed 100% or run in the opposite direction.
| Entity type | Current | Previous | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Co-operative bank | ₹1.1 cr | ₹49.35 L | 70.3% |
| Bank | ₹63.6 L | ₹41.8 L | 25.2% |
| NBFC | ₹26.7 L | ₹22.8 L | 4.5% |
Entity Coverage
- Declared
- 235
- Names extracted
- 245
- Canonical links
- 248
- First seen
- 18
Entity counts are breadth indicators, not action counts. One bulk order can name hundreds of companies.
Orders Still in Force
- Orders
- 27
- Entities
- 27
- Expiring next
- 3
- Duplicate entity rows
- 0
Next expiry window: 1 Aug 2026–31 Aug 2026.