When Action Arrived
Published action records across the covered window, split into RegOversight severity bands. Empty intervals remain visible.
| Interval | Total | S0–S1 · lifted / low | S2–S3 · moderate / high | S4–S5 · major / severe |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Jan | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| 8 Jan | 12 | 2 | 5 | 5 |
| 15 Jan | 8 | 1 | 4 | 3 |
| 22 Jan | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 Jan | 11 | 8 | 2 | 1 |
| 5 Feb | 9 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| 12 Feb | 8 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| 19 Feb | 9 | 4 | 1 | 4 |
| 26 Feb | 14 | 2 | 6 | 6 |
| 4 Mar | 7 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| 11 Mar | 7 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| 18 Mar | 9 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| 25 Mar | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 |
What Stood Out
Each finding is grounded in precomputed metrics. Open it to inspect the supporting numbers and the limits of the claim.
Severe actions took a larger share of the records
Severe actions made up 43.1% of records, up from 37.8% in the previous quarter. The count was 50, compared with 59 previously.
Banks accounted for most of the decline in disclosed penalty value
Disclosed penalty value fell by ₹27.32 crore. Banks accounted for 76.5% of that decline, with current value of ₹9.14 crore against ₹30.05 crore previously.
The penalty distribution was less concentrated at the top
The median penalty was ₹5.0 lakh, up from ₹2.0 lakh. The largest was ₹2.00 crore, down from ₹12.19 crore, while the top five accounted for 48.9%, down from 74.4%.
Orders covered more declared entities than action records
The 116 records declared 130 entities. The three largest orders declared 10, 4 and 3 entities, respectively, with the largest orders declaring 17 entities.
What RBI Did and Where It Landed
Amber bars show the current mix. The fine marker shows the comparable earlier period, so a change is visible rather than merely asserted.
Action mix
Primary recorded action category.
- Monetary penalty72 · 62.1%
Previous 106 · 67.9%
- Business restriction34 · 29.3%
Previous 38 · 24.4%
- Licence cancellation7 · 6%
Previous 10 · 6.4%
- Cease & desist2 · 1.7%
- Action lifted1 · 0.9%
Previous 1 · 0.6%
Lifecycle
Fresh actions, extensions and withdrawals.
- Fresh action82 · 70.7%
Previous 120 · 76.9%
- Extension33 · 28.4%
Previous 35 · 22.4%
- Lifted / withdrawn1 · 0.9%
Previous 1 · 0.6%
Entity types
Action records by regulated-entity class, not entities affected.
- Co-operative bank92 · 79.3%
Previous 126 · 80.8%
- Bank12 · 10.3%
Previous 13 · 8.3%
- NBFC10 · 8.6%
Previous 16 · 10.3%
- Payment entity2 · 1.7%
Previous 1 · 0.6%
Why RBI acted
Overlapping themes; one action may carry several reasons.
- Reporting & disclosure55 · 47.4%
Previous 80 · 51.3%
- Other31 · 26.7%
Previous 34 · 21.8%
- Capital & exposure norms30 · 25.9%
Previous 39 · 25%
- Lending norms29 · 25%
Previous 37 · 23.7%
- Governance & oversight24 · 20.7%
Previous 27 · 17.3%
- Customer protection22 · 19%
Previous 42 · 26.9%
Defining Actions
Up to four non-duplicative actions selected for monetary impact, breadth, severity or relief. Quiet periods may show fewer.
RBI imposes monetary penalty on State Bank of India
26 Feb 2024₹2.00 croremonetary penaltyState Bank of India
State Bank of India was penalized for holding shares as pledgee in excess of the statutory limit and for failing to credit eligible amounts to the Depositor Education and Awareness Fund within the prescribed time. It was the largest disclosed penalty in the period.
Nine NBFCs and One HFC surrender their Certificate of Registration to RBI
9 Feb 2024licence cancellationS.M.I.L.E. Microfinance Limited
The entities surrendered their Certificate of Registration, leading RBI to cancel the CoR. The NBFCs exited the NBFI business, while the HFC exited housing finance business or ceased to be a legal entity after amalgamation, merger, dissolution or strike-off.
RBI cancels the licence of Sumerpur Mercantile Urban Cooperative Bank Limited, Sumerpur, Pali, Rajasthan
28 Feb 2024licence cancellationSumerpur Mercantile Urban Cooperative Bank Limited, Sumerpur, Pali, Rajasthan
Sumerpur Mercantile Urban Cooperative Bank Limited, Sumerpur, Pali, Rajasthan lacked adequate capital and earning prospects and failed multiple eligibility requirements under Sections 11(1) and 22(3) read with Section 56 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. RBI said its continuance was prejudicial to depositors and public interest.
Directions under Section 35A read with Section 56 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 – Dwarkadas Mantri Nagari Sahakari Bank Ltd, Beed – Withdrawal of Directions
26 Feb 2024action liftedDwarkadas Mantri Nagari Sahakari Bank Ltd, Beed
RBI withdrew the Section 35A/Section 56 Directions previously issued to Dwarkadas Mantri Nagari Sahakari Bank Ltd, Beed. The prior directions had been extended from time to time until March 09, 2024.
What It Cost
72 actions had a disclosed amount. Totals and distribution shape are kept separate from action volume.
- Median
- ₹5 L
- Largest
- ₹2 cr
- Top five
- ₹6.93 cr
- 95th percentile
- ₹1.2 cr
Previous ₹2 L
Previous ₹12.19 cr
Previous ₹30.87 cr
Previous ₹2.5 cr
Change by entity type
Arithmetic attribution of the change in disclosed value. Contributions may exceed 100% or run in the opposite direction.
| Entity type | Current | Previous | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bank | ₹9.14 cr | ₹30.05 cr | 76.5% |
| Payment entity | ₹0 | ₹5.39 cr | 19.7% |
| NBFC | ₹49.4 L | ₹3.63 cr | 11.5% |
| Co-operative bank | ₹4.55 cr | ₹2.44 cr | -7.7% |
Entity Coverage
- Declared
- 130
- Names extracted
- 133
- Canonical links
- 133
- First seen
- 62
Entity counts are breadth indicators, not action counts. One bulk order can name hundreds of companies.
Orders Still in Force
- Orders
- 32
- Entities
- 32
- Expiring next
- 31
- Duplicate entity rows
- 0
Next expiry window: 1 Apr 2024–30 Jun 2024.