When Action Arrived
Published action records across the covered window, split into RegOversight severity bands. Empty intervals remain visible.
| Interval | Total | S0–S1 · lifted / low | S2–S3 · moderate / high | S4–S5 · major / severe |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Jan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Jan | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 3 Jan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Jan | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
| 5 Jan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 Jan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 Jan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 Jan | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| 9 Jan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 10 Jan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 11 Jan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 12 Jan | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| 13 Jan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 Jan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 Jan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 Jan | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 Jan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Jan | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 |
| 19 Jan | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 Jan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Jan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Jan | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 Jan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Jan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Jan | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 Jan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Jan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Jan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Jan | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 |
| 30 Jan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Jan | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
What Stood Out
Each finding is grounded in precomputed metrics. Open it to inspect the supporting numbers and the limits of the claim.
Banks accounted for most of the increase in disclosed penalty value
Disclosed penalty value was ₹3.74 crore against ₹57.1 lakh in the previous period, a rise of ₹3.16 crore. Banks accounted for ₹2.50 crore across 3 actions, against ₹0 in 0 actions, representing 79.0% of the increase.
The severe-action share was broadly unchanged
There were 16 severe actions, or 42.1% of the total, with an average severity of 2.71. The previous period had 22 severe actions and a 41.5% share.
A small group of actions accounted for most disclosed penalty value
The largest disclosed penalty was ₹1.20 crore, or 32.3% of the ₹3.74 crore total. The top five actions accounted for 84.3%, while the median penalty was ₹4.0 lakh.
What RBI Did and Where It Landed
Amber bars show the current mix. The fine marker shows the comparable earlier period, so a change is visible rather than merely asserted.
Action mix
Primary recorded action category.
- Monetary penalty24 · 63.2%
Previous 30 · 56.6%
- Business restriction12 · 31.6%
Previous 15 · 28.3%
- Licence cancellation2 · 5.3%
Previous 7 · 13.2%
Lifecycle
Fresh actions, extensions and withdrawals.
- Fresh action27 · 71.1%
Previous 37 · 69.8%
- Extension11 · 28.9%
Previous 15 · 28.3%
Entity types
Action records by regulated-entity class, not entities affected.
- Co-operative bank33 · 86.8%
Previous 50 · 94.3%
- Bank3 · 7.9%
- NBFC1 · 2.6%
Previous 3 · 5.7%
- Payment entity1 · 2.6%
Why RBI acted
Overlapping themes; one action may carry several reasons.
- Reporting & disclosure16 · 42.1%
Previous 25 · 47.2%
- Capital & exposure norms14 · 36.8%
Previous 15 · 28.3%
- Customer protection10 · 26.3%
Previous 13 · 24.5%
- Other10 · 26.3%
Previous 14 · 26.4%
- Governance & oversight8 · 21.1%
Previous 6 · 11.3%
- Lending norms8 · 21.1%
Previous 7 · 13.2%
Defining Actions
Up to four non-duplicative actions selected for monetary impact, breadth, severity or relief. Quiet periods may show fewer.
RBI imposes monetary penalty on Dhanlaxmi Bank Ltd
12 Jan 2024₹1.20 croremonetary penaltyDhanlaxmi Bank Ltd.
Dhanlaxmi Bank Ltd received the largest disclosed penalty of the period. The action concerned non-compliance with RBI directions on loans and advances, KYC, and interest rate on deposits.
Reserve Bank of India cancels the licence of The Hiriyur Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd., Hiriyur, Karnataka
12 Jan 2024licence cancellationThe Hiriyur Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd., Hiriyur
The Hiriyur Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd., Hiriyur became subject to the widest order of the period. RBI said the bank lacked adequate capital and earning prospects, breached multiple provisions of the Banking Regulation Act, and that its continuance was prejudicial to depositors and public interest.
Reserve Bank of India cancels the license of Shree Mahalaxmi Mercantile Co-operative Bank Ltd., Dabhoi, Gujarat
12 Jan 2024licence cancellationShree Mahalaxmi Mercantile Co-operative Bank Ltd., Dabhoi
Shree Mahalaxmi Mercantile Co-operative Bank Ltd., Dabhoi received the highest-severity action for a single entity. RBI said the bank lacked adequate capital and earning prospects, did not comply with key licensing requirements, and that its continuance was prejudicial to depositors and public interest.
What It Cost
24 actions had a disclosed amount. Totals and distribution shape are kept separate from action volume.
- Median
- ₹4 L
- Largest
- ₹1.2 cr
- Top five
- ₹3.15 cr
- Percentiles
- Suppressed
Previous ₹1 L
Previous ₹10.54 L
Previous ₹30.54 L
Too few priced actions for a stable tail estimate.
Change by entity type
Arithmetic attribution of the change in disclosed value. Contributions may exceed 100% or run in the opposite direction.
| Entity type | Current | Previous | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bank | ₹2.5 cr | ₹0 | 79% |
| Co-operative bank | ₹1.18 cr | ₹46.05 L | 22.6% |
| NBFC | ₹6 L | ₹11.03 L | -1.6% |
Entity Coverage
- Declared
- 38
- Names extracted
- 38
- Canonical links
- 38
- First seen
- 8
Entity counts are breadth indicators, not action counts. One bulk order can name hundreds of companies.
Orders Still in Force
- Orders
- 40
- Entities
- 40
- Expiring next
- 11
- Duplicate entity rows
- 0
Next expiry window: 1 Feb 2024–29 Feb 2024.