When Action Arrived
Published action records across the covered window, split into RegOversight severity bands. Empty intervals remain visible.
| Interval | Total | S0–S1 · lifted / low | S2–S3 · moderate / high | S4–S5 · major / severe |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Apr | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| 2 Apr | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 3 Apr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Apr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 Apr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 Apr | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| 7 Apr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 Apr | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 9 Apr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 10 Apr | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 11 Apr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 12 Apr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 Apr | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 14 Apr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 Apr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 Apr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 Apr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Apr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Apr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Apr | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 Apr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Apr | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 Apr | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Apr | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 25 Apr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Apr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Apr | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 28 Apr | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 Apr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Apr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
What Stood Out
Each finding is grounded in precomputed metrics. Open it to inspect the supporting numbers and the limits of the claim.
Severe actions took a larger share of April records
There were 19 severe actions in April, accounting for 67.9% of records, against 10 and 37.0% in March 2026. April included 4 cancellations, compared with 2 in March 2026.
Banks accounted for most of the fall in disclosed penalty value
Disclosed penalty value fell to ₹67.4 lakh from ₹2.99 crore in March 2026, a decline of ₹2.32 crore. Banks accounted for 89.5% of that decline, with their disclosed value at ₹41.8 lakh against ₹2.49 crore previously.
Co-operative banks made up a larger share of the action records
Co-operative banks accounted for 78.6% of the records in April, up from 59.3% in March 2026. Their count was 22, compared with 16 previously, a shift of 19.3 percentage points.
One order covered most of the entities declared in April
The 28 action records declared 81 entities. The widest order, dated 8 April 2026, declared 54 entities in one order.
What RBI Did and Where It Landed
Amber bars show the current mix. The fine marker shows the comparable earlier period, so a change is visible rather than merely asserted.
Action mix
Primary recorded action category.
- Business restriction15 · 53.6%
Previous 5 · 18.5%
- Monetary penalty9 · 32.1%
Previous 20 · 74.1%
- Licence cancellation4 · 14.3%
Previous 2 · 7.4%
Lifecycle
Fresh actions, extensions and withdrawals.
- Extension14 · 50%
Previous 2 · 7.4%
- Fresh action14 · 50%
Previous 25 · 92.6%
Entity types
Action records by regulated-entity class, not entities affected.
- Co-operative bank22 · 78.6%
Previous 16 · 59.3%
- NBFC3 · 10.7%
Previous 4 · 14.8%
- Payment entity2 · 7.1%
Previous 3 · 11.1%
- Bank1 · 3.6%
Previous 4 · 14.8%
Why RBI acted
Overlapping themes; one action may carry several reasons.
- Governance & oversight11 · 39.3%
Previous 8 · 29.6%
- Capital & exposure norms10 · 35.7%
Previous 6 · 22.2%
- Reporting & disclosure8 · 28.6%
Previous 14 · 51.9%
- Customer protection6 · 21.4%
Previous 7 · 25.9%
- Other6 · 21.4%
Previous 3 · 11.1%
- KYC / AML4 · 14.3%
Previous 8 · 29.6%
Defining Actions
Up to four non-duplicative actions selected for monetary impact, breadth, severity or relief. Quiet periods may show fewer.
Reserve Bank of India imposes monetary penalty on Bandhan Bank Limited
24 Apr 2026₹41.8 lakhmonetary penaltyBandhan Bank Limited
RBI imposed a monetary penalty of ₹41.8 lakh on Bandhan Bank Limited for contravention of section 20(1)(b)(iii) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 and non-compliance with RBI KYC directions. It also found lapses in periodic review of risk categorisation of certain accounts and sanction of director-related loans.
RBI cancels Certificate of Registration of 54 NBFCs
8 Apr 2026licence cancellationChefair Impex Ltd
RBI cancelled the Certificates of Registration of 54 NBFCs under Section 45-IA(6) of the RBI Act, 1934. The companies are consequently barred from transacting NBFC business.
RBI cancels the Licence of Paytm Payments Bank Limited
24 Apr 2026licence cancellationPaytm Payments Bank Limited
RBI cancelled the banking licence of Paytm Payments Bank Limited for conducting affairs in a manner detrimental to the bank and its depositors, prejudicial management, non-compliance with licence conditions, and failure to satisfy Section 22 requirements.
RBI cancels the licence of National Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd., Pratapgarh
10 Apr 2026licence cancellationNational Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd., Pratapgarh
RBI cancelled the licence of National Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd., Pratapgarh. The bank lacked adequate capital and earning prospects, did not comply with multiple provisions of the Banking Regulation Act, and its continuance would be prejudicial to depositors and public interest.
What It Cost
9 actions had a disclosed amount. Totals and distribution shape are kept separate from action volume.
- Median
- ₹1.09 L
- Largest
- ₹41.8 L
- Top five
- ₹63.99 L
- Percentiles
- Suppressed
Previous ₹1.25 L
Previous ₹95.4 L
Previous ₹2.81 cr
Too few priced actions for a stable tail estimate.
Change by entity type
Arithmetic attribution of the change in disclosed value. Contributions may exceed 100% or run in the opposite direction.
| Entity type | Current | Previous | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bank | ₹41.8 L | ₹2.49 cr | 89.5% |
| Payment entity | ₹80,000 | ₹38 L | 16% |
| NBFC | ₹11.1 L | ₹3.31 L | -3.4% |
| Co-operative bank | ₹13.69 L | ₹8.7 L | -2.2% |
Entity Coverage
- Declared
- 81
- Names extracted
- 81
- Canonical links
- 81
- First seen
- 3
Entity counts are breadth indicators, not action counts. One bulk order can name hundreds of companies.
Orders Still in Force
- Orders
- 34
- Entities
- 32
- Expiring next
- 5
- Duplicate entity rows
- 2
Next expiry window: 1 May 2026–31 May 2026.