When Action Arrived
Published action records across the covered window, split into RegOversight severity bands. Empty intervals remain visible.
| Interval | Total | S0–S1 · lifted / low | S2–S3 · moderate / high | S4–S5 · major / severe |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Sept | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Sept | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Sept | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 Sept | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 Sept | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 |
| 7 Sept | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 Sept | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 Sept | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 10 Sept | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| 11 Sept | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 12 Sept | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 Sept | 8 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| 14 Sept | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 Sept | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 Sept | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 Sept | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Sept | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Sept | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| 20 Sept | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Sept | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Sept | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Sept | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Sept | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Sept | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Sept | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 Sept | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 Sept | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Sept | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Sept | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
What Stood Out
Each finding is grounded in precomputed metrics. Open it to inspect the supporting numbers and the limits of the claim.
Severe actions took a larger share despite fewer such records
September had 14 severe actions, or 43.8% of the total, compared with 15 and 38.5% in August 2024. The average severity score was 2.78, and September included one cancellation.
Banks and NBFCs accounted for the fall in disclosed penalty value
Disclosed penalty value was ₹4.63 crore, down from ₹11.77 crore in August 2024, a decline of ₹7.14 crore. Bank penalties were ₹3.23 crore across 3 actions, against ₹6.89 crore across 4, while NBFC penalties were ₹55.2 lakh across 7, against ₹4.17 crore across 8.
Fourteen orders in force were due to expire in October
The month ended with 34 orders in force covering 33 entities. Fourteen orders were due to expire between 1 October 2024 and 31 October 2024.
Reporting and disclosure was the most frequent tagged theme
Reporting and disclosure appeared on 18 actions, or 56.3%, while lending norms appeared on 9, or 28.1%. Capital and exposure norms and customer protection each appeared on 6 actions, or 18.8%; the themes overlap and are not exclusive.
What RBI Did and Where It Landed
Amber bars show the current mix. The fine marker shows the comparable earlier period, so a change is visible rather than merely asserted.
Action mix
Primary recorded action category.
- Monetary penalty21 · 65.6%
Previous 30 · 76.9%
- Business restriction10 · 31.3%
Previous 8 · 20.5%
- Licence cancellation1 · 3.1%
Previous 1 · 2.6%
Lifecycle
Fresh actions, extensions and withdrawals.
- Fresh action23 · 71.9%
Previous 31 · 79.5%
- Extension9 · 28.1%
Previous 8 · 20.5%
Entity types
Action records by regulated-entity class, not entities affected.
- Co-operative bank20 · 62.5%
Previous 26 · 66.7%
- NBFC8 · 25%
Previous 9 · 23.1%
- Bank4 · 12.5%
Previous 4 · 10.3%
Why RBI acted
Overlapping themes; one action may carry several reasons.
- Reporting & disclosure18 · 56.3%
Previous 24 · 61.5%
- Lending norms9 · 28.1%
Previous 13 · 33.3%
- Other9 · 28.1%
Previous 8 · 20.5%
- Capital & exposure norms6 · 18.8%
Previous 7 · 17.9%
- Customer protection6 · 18.8%
Previous 8 · 20.5%
- Governance & oversight5 · 15.6%
Previous 8 · 20.5%
Defining Actions
Up to four non-duplicative actions selected for monetary impact, breadth, severity or relief. Quiet periods may show fewer.
RBI imposes monetary penalty on Axis Bank Limited
10 Sept 2024₹1.91 croremonetary penaltyAxis Bank Limited
RBI imposed a ₹1.91 crore monetary penalty on Axis Bank Limited for non-compliance with RBI directions on interest rate on deposits, KYC and credit flow to agriculture, along with contravention of Section 19(1)(a) of the BR Act.
RBI cancels Certificate of Registration of Four NBFCs
13 Sept 2024licence cancellationBharatpur Investment Ltd
RBI cancelled the Certificates of Registration of four NBFCs under Section 45-IA(6) of the RBI Act, barring the companies from transacting the business of a Non-Banking Financial Institution.
Directions under Section 35A read with section 56 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (as applicable to Co-operative Societies) - Shree Mahalaxmi Urban Co-operative Credit Bank Ltd., Gokak (Karnataka)
27 Sept 2024business restrictionShree Mahalaxmi Urban Co-operative Credit Bank Ltd., Gokak
RBI issued Section 35A directions to Shree Mahalaxmi Urban Co-operative Credit Bank Ltd., Gokak, due to supervisory concerns arising from recent adverse material developments, to protect depositors’ interests. The bank is barred from taking fresh business actions and allowing withdrawals, subject to stated exceptions.
What It Cost
21 actions had a disclosed amount. Totals and distribution shape are kept separate from action volume.
- Median
- ₹4.5 L
- Largest
- ₹1.91 cr
- Top five
- ₹4.08 cr
- Percentiles
- Suppressed
Previous ₹3.05 L
Previous ₹2.68 cr
Previous ₹9.74 cr
Too few priced actions for a stable tail estimate.
Change by entity type
Arithmetic attribution of the change in disclosed value. Contributions may exceed 100% or run in the opposite direction.
| Entity type | Current | Previous | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bank | ₹3.23 cr | ₹6.89 cr | 51.2% |
| NBFC | ₹55.15 L | ₹4.17 cr | 50.7% |
| Co-operative bank | ₹84.6 L | ₹70.83 L | -1.9% |
Entity Coverage
- Declared
- 35
- Names extracted
- 36
- Canonical links
- 36
- First seen
- 16
Entity counts are breadth indicators, not action counts. One bulk order can name hundreds of companies.
Orders Still in Force
- Orders
- 34
- Entities
- 33
- Expiring next
- 14
- Duplicate entity rows
- 1
Next expiry window: 1 Oct 2024–31 Oct 2024.