When Action Arrived
Published action records across the covered window, split into RegOversight severity bands. Empty intervals remain visible.
| Interval | Total | S0–S1 · lifted / low | S2–S3 · moderate / high | S4–S5 · major / severe |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Jul | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| 2 Jul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Jul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Jul | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 5 Jul | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 6 Jul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 Jul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 Jul | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 9 Jul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 10 Jul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 11 Jul | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 12 Jul | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| 13 Jul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 Jul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 Jul | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 Jul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 Jul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Jul | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| 19 Jul | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 Jul | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 Jul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Jul | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 23 Jul | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 Jul | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 Jul | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Jul | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| 27 Jul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Jul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Jul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Jul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Jul | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
What Stood Out
Each finding is grounded in precomputed metrics. Open it to inspect the supporting numbers and the limits of the claim.
One penalty made up most of the disclosed value
The largest of 22 disclosed penalties was ₹5.93 crore, or 73.8% of the ₹8.04 crore total. The top five accounted for 96.9%, while the median penalty was ₹2.0 lakh.
Co-operative banks accounted for the increase in penalty value
Co-operative banks carried ₹6.29 crore in July, up from ₹12.0 lakh in June, across 19 actions versus 11. That was 118.7% of the ₹5.20 crore increase because the bank category moved the other way, falling from ₹2.72 crore to ₹1.32 crore.
Severe actions took a smaller share despite rising in count
Severe actions numbered 17, or 45.9% of July actions, compared with 15 and 53.6% in June. Cancellations numbered 6, against 2, while supersessions remained at 0 in both periods.
Ten in-force orders were due to expire in August
The in-force stock stood at 36 orders covering 35 entities. Ten were due to expire between 1 August 2024 and 31 August 2024.
What RBI Did and Where It Landed
Amber bars show the current mix. The fine marker shows the comparable earlier period, so a change is visible rather than merely asserted.
Action mix
Primary recorded action category.
- Monetary penalty22 · 59.5%
Previous 15 · 53.6%
- Business restriction9 · 24.3%
Previous 11 · 39.3%
- Licence cancellation6 · 16.2%
Previous 2 · 7.1%
Lifecycle
Fresh actions, extensions and withdrawals.
- Fresh action28 · 75.7%
Previous 19 · 67.9%
- Extension9 · 24.3%
Previous 9 · 32.1%
Entity types
Action records by regulated-entity class, not entities affected.
- Co-operative bank32 · 86.5%
Previous 24 · 85.7%
- NBFC3 · 8.1%
Previous 1 · 3.6%
- Bank1 · 2.7%
Previous 3 · 10.7%
- Payment entity1 · 2.7%
Why RBI acted
Overlapping themes; one action may carry several reasons.
- Reporting & disclosure16 · 43.2%
Previous 12 · 42.9%
- Capital & exposure norms11 · 29.7%
Previous 11 · 39.3%
- KYC / AML10 · 27%
Previous 4 · 14.3%
- Customer protection8 · 21.6%
Previous 5 · 17.9%
- Other8 · 21.6%
Previous 7 · 25%
- Governance & oversight7 · 18.9%
Previous 9 · 32.1%
Defining Actions
Up to four non-duplicative actions selected for monetary impact, breadth, severity or relief. Quiet periods may show fewer.
RBI imposes monetary penalty on The Mehsana Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd., Gujarat
12 Jul 2024₹5.93 croremonetary penaltyThe Mehsana Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd., Gujarat
This was the largest disclosed penalty in the period. RBI imposed a monetary penalty for multiple compliance failures, including director-related lending, cyber security control lapses, NPA classification issues, multiple UCIC allotments, and donations to an interested trust/institution.
RBI imposes Monetary Penalty on three Payment System Operators
26 Jul 2024₹41.5 lakhmonetary penaltyManappuram Finance Limited
This was the widest order in the period, covering three Payment System Operators. The stated reason was non-compliance with certain provisions of the Master Direction - Know Your Customer (KYC) Direction, 2016.
RBI cancels the licence of The Mahabhairab Cooperative Urban Bank Ltd., Tezpur, Assam
24 Jul 2024licence cancellationThe Mahabhairab Cooperative Urban Bank Ltd., Tezpur, Assam
This was the period’s highest-severity single-entity action. RBI cancelled the bank’s licence because it lacked adequate capital and earning prospects and failed to meet statutory conditions under the Banking Regulation Act. RBI also said its continuance would be prejudicial to depositors and public interest.
What It Cost
22 actions had a disclosed amount. Totals and distribution shape are kept separate from action volume.
- Median
- ₹2 L
- Largest
- ₹5.93 cr
- Top five
- ₹7.79 cr
- Percentiles
- Suppressed
Previous ₹1 L
Previous ₹1.46 cr
Previous ₹2.77 cr
Too few priced actions for a stable tail estimate.
Change by entity type
Arithmetic attribution of the change in disclosed value. Contributions may exceed 100% or run in the opposite direction.
| Entity type | Current | Previous | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Co-operative bank | ₹6.29 cr | ₹12 L | 118.7% |
| Bank | ₹1.32 cr | ₹2.72 cr | -26.9% |
| Payment entity | ₹41.5 L | ₹0 | 8% |
| NBFC | ₹1.9 L | ₹1 L | 0.2% |
Entity Coverage
- Declared
- 39
- Names extracted
- 39
- Canonical links
- 39
- First seen
- 14
Entity counts are breadth indicators, not action counts. One bulk order can name hundreds of companies.
Orders Still in Force
- Orders
- 36
- Entities
- 35
- Expiring next
- 10
- Duplicate entity rows
- 1
Next expiry window: 1 Aug 2024–31 Aug 2024.