Skip to Main Content

State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur

Bank

The RBI action, regulatory basis, and operating impact linked to this entity.

Recorded RBI impact

Monetary penalty

Monetary penalty · Fresh imposition

S3

Published by RBI

29 Apr 2015

Case Brief

The Reserve Bank of India imposed monetary penalties on three public sector banks: Bank of Maharashtra, Dena Bank, and Oriental Bank of Commerce. The action followed a complaint-driven scrutiny and broader thematic review of fixed accounts opened in the name of certain organisations across Mumbai-based branches. RBI found serious regulatory violations relating to KYC/AML compliance, including deficiencies in customer identification and acceptance procedures, monitoring of transactions, handling of RTGS-related funds, opening fixed deposit accounts and extending overdrafts without due diligence, weak internal controls and management oversight, use of internal accounts for parking customer funds, and involvement of middlemen/intermediaries. The penalties were imposed under Section 47A(1)(c) read with Section 46(4)(i) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. Eight additional public sector banks were cautioned to put in place appropriate measures and review them periodically for strict compliance, but no monetary penalty was imposed on them.

Why RBI Acted

KYC / AMLReporting & disclosureCustomer protectionGovernance oversight

RBI imposed monetary penalty on three public sector banks after a thematic review and scrutiny of fixed accounts opened in the name of certain organisations in Mumbai-based branches. The review found violations of RBI instructions and guidelines, including non-adherence to KYC norms (customer identification and acceptance procedures), monitoring of transactions in customer accounts, instructions regarding funds received through RTGS, opening fixed deposit accounts and granting overdrafts against them without due diligence or proper process, weaknesses in internal controls and management oversight, use of internal accounts for parking customer funds, and involvement of middlemen/intermediaries. The penalty was imposed under Section 47A(1)(c) read with Section 46(4)(i) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. Eight other banks were cautioned but not penalised.

Operating Impact

The three penalised banks must absorb the monetary penalty and address the compliance gaps identified by RBI, especially around KYC/AML, transaction monitoring, RTGS controls, and FD/OD diligence. The eight cautioned banks face no monetary penalty in this release, but they are expected to strengthen controls and periodically review compliance processes going forward.

Regulatory Basis

  • Section 47(A) (1) (c) read with Section 46(4)(i) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949

Action Facts

Primary Impact
Monetary penalty
Entities Affected
11
Entity Role
Bulk Member
Entity Type
Bank

Entities similar to State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur

˳
  1. Bank of India

    Bank

    1 shared action

    Rs 13.7 Cr

  2. Union Bank of India

    Bank

    1 shared action

    Rs 8.75 Cr

  3. Bank of Maharashtra

    Bank

    1 shared action

    Rs 8.48 Cr

  4. Punjab National Bank

    Bank

    1 shared action

    Rs 8.13 Cr

  5. UCO Bank

    Bank

    1 shared action

    Rs 6.07 Cr