Skip to Main Content

Sardarganj Mercantile Co-operative Bank Ltd

Co-operative bankGujarat

A source-linked record of 3 RBI actions, their timing, severity, and recurring regulatory themes.

At a Glance

Total actions
3
Total penalties
Rs 6.00 L
Latest action
14 Aug 2025

Enforcement Fingerprint

3 actions across 3 years.

PenaltyRestrictionLicence actionLiftedOther

Action Mix

Monetary penalty3

Lifecycle Mix

Fresh imposition3

Severity Mix

S1 Low2
S2 Moderate1

Source-linked record

Action History

3 linked actions

2025

1

Case brief

RBI imposed a ₹1 lakh penalty on Sardargunj Mercantile Co-operative Bank Limited, Patan, Gujarat. The action was for accepting certain interest-free deposits in accounts other than current account, in breach of RBI directions.

Impact

The bank must pay the monetary penalty and address the compliance lapse identified by RBI. The order does not itself impose a forward-looking operational restriction, but it signals supervisory concern and leaves RBI free to initiate any further action if warranted.

Why RBI acted

Reporting & disclosureOther

Regulatory basis

  • Section 47A(1)(c) read with Sections 46(4)(i) and 56 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949

2023

1

Case brief

RBI imposed a ₹2 lakh penalty on Sardargunj Mercantile Co-operative Bank Limited, Patan, Gujarat. The bank was found non-compliant with RBI directions on placing deposits with other banks, including breach of the prudential inter-bank counterparty exposure limit.

Impact

The bank must absorb the penalty and ensure future compliance with RBI's inter-bank exposure and deposit-placement norms. The action does not indicate a restriction on operations, but it signals heightened regulatory scrutiny of the bank's treasury and counterparty-exposure practices.

Why RBI acted

Capital & exposure normsReporting & disclosure

Regulatory basis

  • section 47A(1)(c) read with sections 46(4)(i) and 56 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949

2022

1

Case brief

RBI imposed a ₹3 lakh penalty on Sardarganj Mercantile Co-operative Bank Ltd., Anand, Gujarat. The penalty was for CRR shortfall and breach of SAF directions on capital expenditure.

Impact

The bank must absorb the ₹3 lakh penalty and remain compliant with RBI’s statutory reserve and SAF requirements going forward. The order does not impose a new operational ban, but it signals continued supervisory scrutiny over the bank’s reserve maintenance and expenditure controls.

Why RBI acted

Capital & exposure normsReporting & disclosure

Regulatory basis

  • Section 47 A (1) (c) read with Sections 46 (4) (i) and 56 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949